Skip to main content

Evaluation Rubrics and Score

EVALUATION RUBRICS FOR KHAN ACADEMY





ACADEMIC WEB SITE EVALUATION RUBRIC:

(For a Teacher Class Website)

  

Developer’s NameKhan Academy , Inc.

URLwww.Khanacademy.org   

Area/Content of Site: Khan Academy offers access to lessons in several subject areas including areas such as Mathematics, Science, English, Economics, and History. It provides lessons with personalized and adapted learning, inclusive of videos and practice exercises.

Purpose: This site’s mission is to provide free, quality education to people all over the world.

Name of Participant: Susan Inniss

 

EVALUATION CRITERIA

DIMENSION

1

POOR

2

BELOW AVERAGE

3

AVERAGE

4

ABOVE AVERAGE

5

EXCELLENT

SCORE

Goal

Goal of this website is unclear and confusing

Conflicting themes make sit’s goals uncertain

Goal is clear but the site contains some unrelated or distracting elements

Clear purpose and goals; but elements seems unnecessary

Goal and purpose of sit is clear with no distracting elements

5

User Friendliness

Unwelcoming to users

Does not evolve a welcoming message

Welcomes visitors but does not appear friendly

Welcoming and appears friendly

Exciting, welcoming and very user-friendly

3

Design

Poorly organised, contains obvious errors, loads slowly and difficult to read

Organisation is confusing; There are some errors and load slowly

Organisation is acceptable, no obvious errors, load adequately and easy to read

God organisation, no errors, load quickly and easy to read

Excellent organisation, free of errors, loads quickly and clearly and all elements are easy to read

5

Navigability

 

 

 

 

 

 

Difficult to find and follow site navigation links

Navigation links visible but somewhat confusing

Navigation links clear and readily available

Navigation link clear and logical; sitemap included

Navigation logical and clear; site map and search engine available

5

Authority

Unclear who is the teacher, and the class the site refers to

Teacher name and contact information included, but insufficient class information

Teacher name and contact information included, and some  class information

Teacher name and contact information included; there is full class information

Teacher provides all necessary information to students, parents and community visitors

5

Content

Content is limited and lack relevance to students and parents

Content appears relevant but quality is limited in student needs

Content is adequate in relevance and quality to meet  student needs

Content is relevant and the quality is sufficient for student needs

Content is on target and provides excellent coverage to meet student needs

5

Dates

No date evident

Sites contains some dates

Site contains both creation and updates information; but there is no date related to class activities

Site contains creation and update information and some dates relating to class activities

Site contains dates for creation, updates and all class activities

5

Links

Few relevant working links

Adequate number of links but many are no longer functional

Sufficient number of links that are all functional

A good variety of useful active links

Links offer connection to a wide variety of excellent sites

4

Handicapped Access

No options available for handicapped

Some pages on the web site offers text-only

Site offers text-only on all pages

Sites offers clear options for handicapped

Site includes handicapped options on all pages and links to support software

4

Extracted from myeducation kit- Teaching and Learning with Technology @2011


Score: 41/45 (91%)


Reason for Score

Khan Academy received a score of 41/ 45. The table below presents the reasons for the specific score being assigned to each section.



Area

Score

Reason

Goal

5- Goal and purpose of sit is clear with no distracting elements

Khan Academy clearly states its goal on the "About" webpage.

Our mission is to provide a free, world class education for anyone, anywhere.

https://www.khanacademy.org/about

User Friendliness

3-Welcomes visitors but does not appear friendly

The Interface is too formal for school age children and does not welcome viewers to the site until they have signed up. 

Design

5- Excellent organisation, free of errors, loads quickly and clearly and all elements are easy to read

Site is organised well, is free from errors, loads easily and all elements are easy to read.

Navigability

5- Navigation logical and clear; site map and search engine available

Site is easy to navigate, and documentation is clear. Site map and search engine are easily accessible.

Authority

5- Teacher provides all necessary information to students, parents and community visitors

It is clear who is the teacher. The teachers can import their google classroom, manage students, upload and assign activities, and add parents or other persons to view lessons and activities.

Content

5- Content is on target and provides excellent coverage to meet student needs

Content is adaptive and allows learners to learn at their own pace. The teacher can track and support the progress of the learner. Core Subject areas are covered comprehensively.

Dates

5-Site contains dates for creation, updates and all class activities

Dates are shown when activities and content are uploaded by teachers into their classroom, dates are shown for assigned and scheduled activities and when students read, or watch assigned resources.

Links

4- A good variety of useful active links

All links are active and working efficiently. However, most external links are to YouTube videos.

Handicapped Access

4- Sites offers clear options for handicapped

The site does have some accessibility options for person that may have low vision or colour blindness and for learners with low sensitivity to animation. Available videos have transcripts and subtitles for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. However, with regards to the entire site there is no built-in text to speech option.



Links













Comments